B2B Scrap Metal Procurement: Navigating Structural Scarcity, Extreme Volatility, and the Path to Supply Chain Resilience

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Market Defined by Structural Risk and Polarization

The B2B scrap metal buying landscape currently operates under conditions of extreme volatility, structural scarcity, and pervasive transactional friction, leading to a market that is fundamentally not smooth for the majority of participants. The industry stands at a critical juncture, defined by an impending global supply deficit driven by decarbonization mandates and a significant rise in demand from Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) steelmaking.1 Key friction points include acute price instability (with monthly fluctuations reaching 30% in some segments) 2, high operational complexity stemming from the necessity of quality assurance (reducing tramp elements) 1, and mounting regulatory burdens (such as the EU Waste Shipment Regulation) that threaten global trade flows.3 Large industrial buyers are strategically responding to these risks by internalizing supply control through vertical integration 1, deploying capital-intensive AI and digitalization systems for precise quality assurance 4, and adopting sophisticated financial hedging to stabilize margins.6 These strategic actions, while essential for major stakeholders, reinforce

market polarization, where well-capitalized entities secure the highest quality material and margin protection, leaving smaller participants exposed to heightened transactional difficulty and opacity.7

I. THE STRUCTURAL CRISIS: DEFINING THE B2B SUPPLY CHALLENGE

The primary long-term challenge facing B2B scrap metal procurement is the shift from a conventional environment to one dominated by acute, structural scarcity. This transition is not cyclical but driven by fundamental changes in global manufacturing processes and climate policy.

A. The Impending Global Scrap Deficit and EAF Demand

Global supply of carbon steel scrap is definitively lagging demand growth, creating a strategic challenge that impacts economic stability in developed and developing nations alike.1 Analysis forecasts that the global market, which historically maintained a 9 million metric ton steel scrap surplus, will transition into a significant

15 million metric ton deficit by 2030.1 This deficit is fueled by demand increasing at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3.3% over the next eight years, outpacing the projected supply growth rate of 3.0% CAGR.1

This shift is intrinsic to the global steel industry’s drive toward decarbonization. As industries seek to reduce carbon emissions, scrap is increasingly becoming the material of choice for steel production, predominantly through EAF operations.1 By volume, scrap metal is projected to account for 50% of the global iron content utilized in steel production by 2030.1 The industry lacks the infrastructure and sufficiently collected reserves of obsolete scrap to meet the pace of EAF expansion and the corresponding demand for cleaner feedstock.

B. The Scarcity of Prime Scrap and Quality Requirements

The scarcity issue is most critical in high-quality materials. Prime scrap, also known as pre-consumer or prompt scrap, is a cleaner by-product continuously recycled from manufacturing processes and is highly valued for high-quality applications.1 Its cleaner profile is also preferred because it enables processing with fewer carbon dioxide emissions.1 The availability of this essential material is projected to be hardest hit by the supply-demand imbalance, with a deficit potentially reaching nearly

30 million metric tons by 2030.1 This deficit is amplified by periods of economic volatility, where reduced manufacturing output directly translates to lower volumes of prime scrap generation.1

For B2B buyers, the challenge is clear: the structural deficit and rising quality concerns (related to residuals) necessitate immediate, decisive action to secure supply.

C. Strategic Sourcing Response: Vertical Integration and In-Sourcing

In response to these structural challenges, strategic buyers are focusing on securing supply volume and controlling quality through vertical integration. To lock in consistent supplies, many steel companies are acquiring scrap yards. In the US, for example, 25% to 30% of scrap supply is already managed by scrap yards owned by the steel mills themselves.1 In Europe, this trend is intensifying alongside the EAF transition; ArcelorMittal has proactively acquired a series of scrap recycling facilities from Germany’s Alba International.1

Vertical integration serves as a dual-purpose defensive mechanism: it assures supply volume and, crucially, allows steelmakers to dictate and control material quality, directly mitigating concerns over purity and tramp elements. Other companies pursue organic growth, such as India’s Tata Steel, which has invested in developing an auto shredding unit adjacent to its new EAF plant.1 Meanwhile, developing nations such as India and China face persistent difficulties in accumulating scrap at scale due to underdeveloped circular supply chains, nascent recycling infrastructure, and prohibitive costs associated with transporting scrap from collection sites to mills.1

II. FINANCIAL FRICTION: EXTREME VOLATILITY AND MARKET OPACITY

The smoothness of the B2B scrap metal market is severely undermined by high-frequency price volatility and fundamental market opacity, which together generate significant transactional friction and market polarization.

A. The Dynamics of Price Volatility and Market Swings

The scrap market is acutely sensitive to global economic conditions, resulting in quantified instability. Scrap metal prices fluctuate frequently, often changing by 10-15% within a single month 9, with some market segments experiencing volatility as high as

30% in a single month.2 This hyper-volatility makes traditional long-term contracting extremely risky for both buyers and sellers, demanding instead daily, real-time tactical procurement and margin protection strategies.

The ferrous scrap market in 2025 illustrates this extreme instability. In February, the market exhibited strong bullish sentiment, marked by a Trend Indicator rising to 69.5, driven by tight availability exacerbated by seasonal weather and logistical slowdowns.10 However, this strength reversed dramatically by May 2025, where the market consensus signaled a strong bearish trend, with the Trend Indicator plummeting to 25.4 (well below the 35-point bearish threshold) and forecasting a sharp

9.5% month-on-month price decrease.11 Non-ferrous metals, particularly Copper and Rare Earths, also face extreme price swings.8 Price movements are intrinsically linked to the price of virgin metals (as higher virgin metal costs make recycled alternatives more attractive) 13 and are heavily influenced by GDP growth and industrial production, especially in major consuming nations like China.2

B. Market Polarization and Transactional Opacity

A major component of market friction is the opacity of actual transaction prices versus quoted prices, which severely complicates strategic decision-making for many participants.7 This lack of transparency is a core measure of the market’s inherent unsmoothness.

Market polarization is accelerating, driven by the competitive strategies of large recycling enterprises. These enterprises dominate procurement by leveraging superior access to capital, allowing them to absorb short-term price premiums that would be unsustainable for smaller competitors.7 They deploy sophisticated systems, including

dynamic pricing models that adjust procurement rates multiple times daily in response to factors like demand and inventory levels.7 These aggressive procurement approaches, combined with the benefits of vertical integration and scale economies, create a deeply uneven competitive landscape. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face significant liquidity and operational challenges, often finding themselves at a competitive disadvantage in securing materials.8 The transactional friction resulting from opacity and aggressive dynamic pricing means that market smoothness is effectively a privilege reserved for the technologically and financially advanced few.

C. Mitigating Price Risk: Hedging Barriers for B2B Entities

For major buyers, financial risk management is mandatory for protecting margins in a volatile market.16 Sophisticated B2B buyers utilize financial instruments tied to global exchanges such as the London Metal Exchange (LME) and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME).17 These instruments include futures contracts, which allow companies to lock in a price for a specified amount of metal at a future date 6, and options contracts, which offer the flexibility to buy or sell at a set price without the obligation, thus providing protection while retaining upside opportunity.6 Companies can also utilize customized physical forward or swap derivatives arranged with banks to buffer financial and supply-price volatility.20

Despite the clear necessity of hedging, the adoption rate among smaller B2B entities remains low due to significant financial barriers. Exchange-based instruments, particularly futures, require the posting of collateral, known as margin, to ensure the deal goes through.20 This margin requirement ties up a company’s working capital, which can be especially challenging and costly for capital-constrained SMEs.20 Furthermore, implementing and managing complex hedging strategies effectively demands specialized financial expertise often lacking in smaller operations, contributing to an uneven competitive landscape where the unhedged participant bears massive exposure to market shocks.19

Table II.1: Comparison of Price Risk Management Instruments

Instrument	Primary Risk Mitigated	Market Access	Barrier to SME Adoption
Futures Contracts	Outright price volatility	LME/CME (Busheling Steel Scrap, Copper, etc.)	High margin requirements, capital tie-up
Options Contracts	Catastrophic price swings, retaining upside	LME/CME	High complexity, premium costs
Physical Forwards/Swaps	Budgeting uncertainty, margin stabilization	Over-The-Counter (OTC) via banks	Requires established financial partnership, customization fees

 

III. QUALITY, CONTAMINATION, AND THE COST OF PURITY

The quality and purity of scrap metal are non-negotiable for modern B2B buyers, as these factors directly dictate the integrity and final application of manufactured products. Assuring purity represents a major operational challenge that requires substantial capital investment.

A. The Residuals Challenge and Product Integrity Risk

A primary technical challenge is the presence of residuals, or tramp elements, which are impurities that accumulate on steel each time it is recycled.1 As recycling rates increase globally—a necessary component of decarbonization—the concentration of these tramp elements grows, which degrades the metallurgical properties of the final steel product.

Contaminated or misclassified metal poses critical risks to end-product quality, process integrity, and safety.22 For large EAF mills, particularly those producing high-quality, flat-rolled steel, securing consistently cleaner scrap is essential.1 Misidentified metal used in critical components, such as aerospace or automobile parts, could result in catastrophic fractures or structural failures.22 Beyond inherent residuals, incoming scrap loads present diverse hazards, including chemical contamination, oil, grease, battery acid, explosive gasses, and the serious risk of radioactive materials from various industrial and medical sources.23

B. B2B Buyer Strategies and Technological Quality Assurance

To mitigate the quality risk, large B2B buyers are fundamentally changing procurement practices by internalizing control. Instead of relying solely on supplier documentation, steelmakers are establishing sophisticated scrap sorting and testing facilities within their mill gates to directly manage quality categorization.1

Quality assurance begins with meticulous inspection of incoming loads to identify and reject hazardous or unauthorized materials.23 Initial visual checks are followed by high-precision chemical analysis using new techniques like Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), which allow for rapid and accurate determination of metal composition.22 In sophisticated facilities, handheld spectrometer guns may be used to assess multiple samples per shipment (e.g., top, bottom, and random samples) to verify composition before approval.1

This demand for precision has driven the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotic systems. AI-powered sorting systems, utilizing machine learning and computer vision on data from high-resolution cameras and sensors, can recognize and separate various metal alloys with high accuracy, often exceeding 95%.4 Robotic arms handle high-speed sorting and heavy lifting, improving consistency and worker safety by reducing exposure to hazardous materials.4 This technological transformation moves scrap quality assurance from a subjective, manual process to an objective, data-driven one. However, this transition necessitates significant capital expenditure (CapEx) 28, which creates a technological barrier that reinforces the market polarization described previously, separating suppliers who can afford automation from those who cannot.

IV. LOGISTICAL AND REGULATORY BOTTLENECKS (ASSESSING MARKET SMOOTHNESS)

Logistical instability and complex, rapidly evolving regulatory environments create significant non-price risks that directly impair the transactional smoothness and predictability of global B2B scrap metal trade.

A. International Trade Friction and Geopolitical Influence

Global trade in scrap metal is heavily influenced by geopolitical decisions designed to protect domestic industries. More than 40 countries currently impede or ban scrap exports, either directly or indirectly, to secure raw materials for their local markets.29 These shifting policies, sanctions (e.g., against Russia, a major supplier) 11, and trade disputes directly affect the flow of materials across borders, generating supply chain turbulence.11

Logistical costs are another major friction point. Problems such as critical port congestion, shortages of shipping containers, and long delays create bottlenecks in the movement of materials.30 Rising bulk freight rates add substantial risk to international transactions, with increases of

$30-$50 per metric ton reported on transatlantic cargoes depending on destination, significantly affecting margins for ferrous scrap exporters.31 To mitigate these escalating transportation costs, scrap processors rely on volume reduction technologies, such as powerful balers and shears, to densify large, scraggly piles of metal into uniform packages, efficiently utilizing truck, railcar, and barge capacity.33

B. The EU Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) and Imminent Trade Collapse

The new EU Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR, EU 2024/1157), adopted in March 2024, represents perhaps the most acute source of regulatory friction, potentially disrupting global recycling markets and positioning the EU recycling industry at a severe competitive disadvantage.3

The WSR’s core objectives are to enhance environmental control, strengthen enforcement against illegal shipments, and strategically keep valuable secondary raw materials, such as ferrous scrap, within the EU to support the Circular Economy and decarbonization goals.34 Operationally, the regulation mandates a transition to a single European digital platform for all transfers, eliminating paper-based procedures, which requires significant internal adaptation for businesses.36

However, the critical immediate risk stems from new export restrictions to non-OECD countries. Under the WSR, non-OECD nations must submit a request demonstrating compliance with stringent environmental standards by February 21, 2025, to continue importing EU-classified recycled materials.3 Industry warnings indicate that most of the nearly 150 non-OECD nations are “simply not ready yet” due to the overwhelming administrative burden posed by the new, complex procedures involving “huge data sets and numerous questions”.3 If these countries fail to submit requests by the deadline, a

blanket ban on EU exports will take effect by May 21, 2027.3 This collapse of outlet markets would artificially shrink the EU recycling industry, leading to significant financial losses for recyclers and the potential landfilling of recyclable materials, transforming a resource security policy into an industrial crisis.3

Compounding this, the European Commission introduced customs surveillance on imports and exports of ferrous, aluminum, and copper scrap in July 2025 as part of the Steel and Metal Action Plan (SMAP).37 This action is explicitly designed to monitor “scrap leakage” to third countries, which has been incentivized by rising global prices and the introduction of external tariffs, such as the US 50% tariff on various steel and aluminum products.37 Geopolitical actions designed to secure domestic supply, such as the WSR and customs surveillance, inevitably introduce uncertainty and complexity into global contracts, significantly impairing transactional smoothness.

Table IV.1: Major Regulatory and Logistical Friction Points

Friction Point	Category	Specific Impact on B2B Operations	Smoothness Impact
WSR Non-OECD Ban Risk	Regulatory/Trade	Potential blanket ban on exports to 150 countries by May 2027.	High
Freight Rate Volatility	Logistical/Cost	Transatlantic freight rate increases ($30-$50/mt) complicate pricing.	Medium-High
US/EU Tariff Dynamics	Geopolitical/Supply	Incentivizes scrap leakage, tightening domestic EU supply base.	High
Transactional Opacity	Market Structure	Actual transaction prices are obscured, leading to inconsistent bidding.	High

 

V. THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: PATHWAYS TO SMOOTHER TRANSACTIONS

Widespread digitalization, powered by artificial intelligence and automation, represents the most viable strategic pathway to mitigating structural supply risk, price volatility, and quality inconsistency, thereby enhancing transactional smoothness for B2B scrap buyers.

A. Digital Trading Platforms and Market Transparency

Digital marketplaces are fundamentally transforming the traditionally slow and opaque scrap trading sector by replacing localized networks and manual negotiations.39 These online platforms remove geographical barriers, expanding market reach and improving price discovery for participants due to increased competition.40

Crucially, digital platforms address core transactional friction and opacity.7 They provide enhanced visibility into pricing trends, allowing market participants to make informed decisions.40 Platforms improve trust and security by implementing Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols to verify suppliers and offer mechanisms to manage payment risk, substantially reducing the risk of non-payment for sellers.39 Furthermore, emerging technologies like Blockchain are being explored to provide a secure, transparent ledger for transactions, enhancing trust and providing the necessary traceability for meeting stringent environmental and sustainability objectives.28

B. AI, Robotics, and Operational Efficiency

The integration of AI and robotics is transforming the technical challenges of quality control and processing speed. Traditional sorting methods often result in material contamination and suffer from high operational costs and manual inefficiencies.27

AI-driven smart recycling systems optimize waste sorting processes, enhance material recovery, and reduce operating costs.41 These systems use machine learning algorithms, trained on vast data sets, to leverage computer vision for real-time identification and classification of materials based on type, composition, color, and shape.41 AI-powered robotic arms complement this intelligence by performing high-speed sorting and reducing human intervention in hazardous environments, ensuring purer metal streams and higher resale value.4 This technological integration results in tangible environmental benefits, including minimized energy-intensive refining processes and optimized energy use within recycling facilities.27

C. Digital Scrap Yard Management and Predictive Intelligence

Achieving operational smoothness in large-scale scrap procurement requires integrated digital management systems. Cloud-based Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Yard Management Solutions (YMS) streamline inventory, logistics, and payments.42 These systems provide real-time data on incoming material flow (such as scrap steel or brass), which is crucial for managing inventory levels and preparing facilities to handle materials without costly understocking or overstocking.43

Digitalization extends beyond tracking to providing predictive intelligence. AI algorithms are utilized to predict market trends by analyzing large volumes of market data—including prices, supply, demand, and trade patterns—enabling recyclers and buyers to make more informed decisions regarding procurement timing and inventory management.44 Advanced automation solutions in scrap yards include 3D measurement of yard volume, automated scrap transport, and online analysis systems for quality-controlled shredder scrap production, all essential elements for managing scarce and costly resources efficiently.5 The resilience of future B2B operations hinges on the ability to transform volatile market data into actionable, predictive intelligence.

VI. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The analysis confirms that the B2B scrap metal market is undergoing a fundamental structural transformation marked by scarcity, volatility, and regulatory hardening. Resilience for B2B buyers will be determined by a coordinated strategy across physical asset control, financial risk mitigation, and digital technology adoption.

A. Recommendations for Securing Long-Term Supply and Quality

1. Prioritize Vertical Integration: High-volume scrap consumers, particularly EAF steelmakers, must view securing captive supply channels through vertical integration as a primary defense against the long-term structural deficit and residual risk.1 This involves either acquiring existing scrap yards or investing in organic processing capabilities, such as auto-shredding units, to internalize control over both supply volume and material quality.1
2. Mandate Advanced Quality Control: Buyers must shift away from reliance on external supplier certification by internalizing quality assurance. Implementing scrap inspection at the mill gate, using handheld spectroscopy (LIBS/XRF) for chemical verification, and investing in AI-powered sorting for mixed material streams are necessary CapEx investments.1 The cost of this advanced technology is justified by the margin protection and reduced risk of product failure derived from purity assurance.27
3. Optimize Logistical Efficiency: To counteract unpredictable freight costs—a major non-price friction point—buyers should require suppliers to utilize volume reduction technology (baling and shearing) to maximize payload density. Integrating logistics management software to track and streamline inbound material flow is also critical.33

B. Recommendations for Mitigating Financial and Regulatory Risk

1. Adopt Comprehensive Hedging Protocols: Strategic buyers must fully utilize LME/CME futures and options contracts to buffer high-frequency price volatility across both ferrous and non-ferrous commodities (e.g., Copper and Busheling Steel Scrap).6 For capital-constrained SMEs, leveraging physical forward or swap derivatives arranged with financial partners offers a critical means to fix inventory cost exposure and stabilize profit margins without incurring high margin capital requirements.19
2. Plan for EU Regulatory Disruption: EU-based exporters must immediately develop contingency plans to address the high probability of the WSR non-OECD export ban taking effect in May 2027.3 This planning must include efforts to diversify non-OECD sales channels and explore increasing domestic capacity to absorb potential internal oversupply, while actively supporting industry efforts to lobby for extension or flexibility in the complex WSR deadlines.3
3. Leverage Digital Platforms for Price Discovery: To combat market opacity and polarization, procurement teams should utilize digital marketplaces and subscribe to premium market intelligence services that track actual transaction prices versus opaque quoted prices. This reduces informational asymmetry and allows for more aggressive, risk-adjusted strategic bidding.7

The future resilient B2B scrap buyer will be defined by integration: the synchronization of captive physical supply, sophisticated financial risk mitigation, and predictive digital intelligence. Companies that fail to make the necessary capital investments in quality technology, secure supply, and financial hedging risk being marginalized to highly volatile spot markets for lower-quality material, incurring a substantial competitive disadvantage in the increasingly demanding industrial landscape of 2030.

Works cited

1. Shortfalls in Scrap Will Challenge the Steel Industry | BCG, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/shortfalls-in-scrap-will-challenge-steel-industry
2. Scrap Metal Prices Explained: Key Factors Driving Market Fluctuations | Okon Recycling, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.okonrecycling.com/industrial-scrap-metal-recycling/steel-and-aluminum/scrap-metal-prices/
3. EuRIC urges immediate extension of EU WSR deadlines to avert …, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://euric.org/resource-hub/press-releases-statements/euric-urges-immediate-extension-of-eu-wsr-deadlines-to-avert-recycling-market-collapse
4. Zero Waste Metal Recycling: AI Sorting, Closed-Loop, And ROI, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.okonrecycling.com/industrial-scrap-metal-recycling/steel-and-aluminum/zero-waste-metal-recycling-2/
5. Automatic Scrap Yard – Primetals Technologies, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.primetals.com/en/portfolio/solutions/automation-and-digitalization/automatic-scrap-yard/
6. The Best Hedging Strategies for Scrap Metal Brokers, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://hrhmetals.com/blogs/f/the-best-hedging-strategies-for-scrap-metal-brokers
7. Scrap Price Surge Drives Market Polarization in Metal Recycling – Discovery Alert, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/market-polarization-metal-recycling-price-dynamics-2025/
8. trend of scrap metal 2025: Volatility & Growth Insights – Accio, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.accio.com/business/trend-of-scrap-metal
9. Scrap Metal Prices and Value: Identify, Sort, and Sell for Maximum Profit | Okon Recycling, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.okonrecycling.com/industrial-scrap-metal-recycling/steel-and-aluminum/determine-scrap-metal-value/
10. US scrap trends outlook: February 2025 – Fastmarkets, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.fastmarkets.com/insights/us-scrap-trends-outlook-february-2025/
11. Current Scrap Metal Price Trends: Everything You Need to Know – Okon Recycling, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.okonrecycling.com/consumer-recycling-initiatives/learn-about-recycling/current-scrap-metal-price-trends/
12. US scrap trends outlook: May 2025 – Fastmarkets, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.fastmarkets.com/insights/us-scrap-trends-outlook-may-2025/
13. What Causes Scrap Metal Rates to Fluctuate?, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://sgt-scrap.com/blog/factors-that-affect-scrap-metal-rates/
14. The Outlook For Aluminum, Steel & Copper Prices – J.P. Morgan, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/commodities/aluminum-steel-copper-prices
15. Dynamic Pricing: What It Is & Why It’s Important | HBS Online, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-dynamic-pricing
16. 4 Price Risk Management Strategies To Protect Margins In A Volatile Steel Market 4, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.worthingtonsteel.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/worthington-steel-price-risk-management-white-paper.pdf
17. Risk Management | Metal Exchange, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.metalexchange.com/what-we-do/risk-management
18. Hedging | London Metal Exchange, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.lme.com/en/sustainability-and-physical-markets/physical-market-benefits/hedging
19. A Leg Up In Metals Price Risk – CIH – Commodity & Ingredient Hedging, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.cihedging.com/posts/articles/a-leg-up-in-metals-price-risk/
20. Hedging Strategies to Manage Price Volatility | Fifth Third Bank, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.53.com/content/fifth-third/en/financial-insights/business/markets-economy/hedging-strategies-to-manage-price-volatility-metals-materials-construction.html
21. How Have Capital Levels of Futures Commission Merchants Changed Since the Global Financial Crisis? – Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2025/507
22. A Big Frustration for Scrap Metal Recyclers – Thermo Fisher Scientific, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/metals/a-big-frustration-for-scrap-metal-recyclers/
23. Scrap Metal | NH Department of Environmental Services, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.des.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt341/files/documents/2020-01/bmp-scrap-metal.pdf
24. Guidance for the Identification and Control of Safety and Health Hazards in Metal Scrap Recycling – OSHA, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3348-metal-scrap-recycling.pdf
25. Top Trends in the Scrap Metal Industry for 2025 – Action Metals Recyclers, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.actionmetalsrecyclers.com/top-trends-in-the-scrap-metal-industry-for-2025/
26. An Efficient and Accurate Quality Inspection Model for Steel Scraps Based on Dense Small-Target Detection – MDPI, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/12/8/1700
27. How AI is Transforming Industrial Scrap Metal Sorting Efficiency – Global Ardour Recycling, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://globalardour.co.uk/how-ai-is-transforming-industrial-scrap-metal-sorting-efficiency/
28. Zero Waste Metal Recycling: Benefits, Process & How to Implement, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.okonrecycling.com/industrial-scrap-metal-recycling/steel-and-aluminum/zero-waste-metal-recycling/
29. changing the rules barriers to scrap metal trade in emerging markets – Waste & Recycling, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.wasterecyclingmag.com/news/metal-recycling/changing-the-rules-barriers-to-scrap-metal-trade-in-emerging-markets
30. The Impact of Metal Supply Chain Disruptions on Recycling, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://globalardour.co.uk/the-impact-of-metal-supply-chain-disruptions-on-recycling/
31. Bulk freight increases complicate ferrous trade flows – Steel Market Update, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/2025/06/19/bulk-freight-increases-complicate-ferrous-trade-flows/
32. Scrap export market shows signs of weakness – Steel Market Update, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/2025/09/16/scrap-export-market-shows-signs-of-weakness/
33. Managing Freight Costs in Scrap Processing: The Role of Volume Reduction Technology, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://recyclinginside.com/recycle-metals/managing-freight-costs-in-scrap-processing-the-role-of-volume-reduction-technology/
34. the contribution of the waste shipment regulation to euambitions on circularity and climate – Eurofer, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.eurofer.eu/assets/publications/position-papers/contribution-of-the-waste-shipment-regulation-to-eu-ambitions-on-circularity-and-climate/20200728_EUROFER-Input-WSRConsultation_Paper_Final.pdf
35. Waste shipments – Environment – European Commission, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-shipments_en
36. How will the new EU regulation 2024/1157 on waste shipments affect your company, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://scrapad.com/en/blog/how-will-the-new-eu-regulation-2024-1157-on-waste-shipments-affect-your-company/
37. Commission introduces surveillance of imports and exports of metal scrap, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-introduces-surveillance-imports-and-exports-metal-scrap-2025-07-23_en
38. EU: European Commission announces surveillance of imports and exports of metal scrap, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://kpmg.com/us/en/taxnewsflash/news/2025/07/tnf-eu-european-commission-announces-surveillance-of-imports-and-exports-of-metal-scrap.html
39. WME, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.worldmetalexchange.com/en/resources/how-digital-marketplaces-are-transforming-the-metal-recycling-industry
40. Digital Trading Scrap Metal: Emerging Marketplaces for Scrap Metals – MD Metals, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.mdmetals.com/2025/08/07/digital-trading-scrap-metal/
41. AI-Driven Smart Recycling: The Future of Waste Sorting – RecyclingInside, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://recyclinginside.com/recycling-technology/instrumentation-and-control/ai-driven-smart-recycling-the-future-of-waste-sorting/
42. How To Make Money in the Scrap Metal Industry – WeighPay, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.weighpay.com/blog/how-to-make-money-in-the-scrap-metal-industry
43. Streamlining Scrap Yard Operations with Real-Time Data and Customizable Reports, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.weighpay.com/blog/streamlining-scrap-yard-operations-with-real-time-data-and-customizable-reports
44. Technological Advancements in Scrap Metal Sorting and Processing – ScrapWare, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.scrapware.com/blog/technological-advancements-in-scrap-metal-sorting-and-processing/
45. Scrap Metal Prices 2025: What Drives Value and How Businesses Can Maximize Returns, accessed on October 6, 2025, https://www.okonrecycling.com/industrial-scrap-metal-recycling/steel-and-aluminum/current-trends-scrap-metal-pricing/